Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor | Counterview

In a recent judgment, the Honourable Supreme Court recognised walking as a fundamental right of citizens.

What led the Court to make such a significant observation? And why have our cities, for so long, overlooked walking as one of the most fundamental means of mobility?

While the Court’s observation is appreciable, it also raises several important concerns. This article explores the Supreme Court’s declaration from multiple perspectives to understand the realities on the ground and the different needs, challenges, and claims that shape our streets.